![]() ![]() In the published 1927 paper, Heisenberg originally concluded that the uncertainty principle was Δ pΔ q ≈ h using the full Planck constant. In physical and mathematical terms, it constrains the degree of precision we can ever talk about having about a system. ![]() The Uncertainty people was implicit in the first set of equations that Heisenberg produced. Fortunately there are people like Mehta who have done the historical research. Introduced first in 1927 by the German physicist Werner Heisenberg, the uncertainty principle states that the more precisely the position of some particle is determined, the less precisely its momentum can be predicted from initial conditions, and vice versa. Heisenberg's uncertainty principle is a very precise mathematical statement about the nature of a quantum system. There are a couple of dozen pages of heavy math in Heisenbergs 1927 article, and people slightingly speak of his 'heuristic' contribution. The uncertainty principle implies that it is in general not possible to predict the value of a quantity with arbitrary certainty, even if all initial conditions are specified. Such variable pairs are known as complementary variables or canonically conjugate variables and, depending on interpretation, the uncertainty principle limits to what extent such conjugate properties maintain their approximate meaning, as the mathematical framework of quantum physics does not support the notion of simultaneously well-defined conjugate properties expressed by a single value. The 'Heisenbergs uncertainty principle' article in Simple Wikipedia is, in my opinion, a little bit flawed. In quantum mechanics, the uncertainty principle (also known as Heisenberg's uncertainty principle) is any of a variety of mathematical inequalities asserting a fundamental limit to the accuracy with which the values for certain pairs of physical quantities of a particle, such as position, x, and momentum, p, can be predicted from initial conditions. Uncertainty principle of Heisenberg, 1927. In quantum mechanics, you only talk about probability.Canonical commutation rule for position q and momentum p variables of a particle, 1927. It's just a localised region where finding the electron is the most probable. In an orbital, the position or momentum of the electron is not defined. That's why people talk about orbitals and electron clouds. Thus, the idea of definite path or orbits for an electron is out of question. No! Absolutely not! It is not possible to do it and it's the basic nature of the electron that you cannot make simultaneous measurements of position and momentum accurately. Is that an inadequacy in the theory or some error in the measuring instrument ? In other words, the exact trajectory of an electron is indeterminate and this is a basic law of nature. Also, for a precise measurement of momentum, you pay the price of a pretty uncertain measurement in position. It once again reminds us that in quantum mechanics we simply can no longer talk about the location or the trajectory of a particle with any certainty. What this means is that, when you try to figure out its position to somewhat accuracy, the momentum measurements become highly uncertain. According to the uncertainty principle, the position and the conjugate momentum of a particle such as an electron cannot be determined simultaneously to an arbitrary degree of accuracy.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |